In her now-controversial video, Thapar described namaz as a full-body exercise that enhances flexibility and improves blood circulation. She shared this perspective shortly after Eid, a time when many Muslims engage in prayer and reflection. Yet, rather than sparking healthy dialogue, her post led to online trolling and derogatory comments directed at her—an experience she stated has persisted for three weeks.

Thapar has previously created content on various religious practices without facing similar backlash. This context matters because it underscores how sensitive discussions around faith can be; what resonates positively within one community can ignite outrage in another. In response to the trolling, she invoked the concept of karma: “Hinduism has a concept called Karma. God is watching,” she remarked, emphasizing personal accountability in discourse.

But why did this particular video attract such intense scrutiny? Thapar questioned the silence surrounding online abuse against women, suggesting that many choose not to speak up until they are directly affected. “Aapke liye koi nahi bolega. You have to speak up for yourself,” she urged her audience, reflecting a broader issue of women’s voices being silenced in digital spaces.

Amidst the negativity, Thapar also called for respect across religions. “Mujhe sikhaaya gaya hai, R for religion means R for respect. And is this how you respect? Especially two women,” she said—drawing attention to the need for mutual understanding and kindness among diverse faiths. Her call for respect is particularly poignant given the recent increase in online harassment targeted at women who express their views publicly.

In addition to her reel on namaz, Thapar has made several videos discussing Hindu religious practices and their associated health benefits without controversy. This inconsistency raises questions about how society perceives different religions and the biases that may exist within public discourse.

As observers continue to analyze this situation, it remains to be seen how it will impact Thapar’s career and public image moving forward. Details remain unconfirmed regarding any potential fallout from this incident or whether it will lead to broader conversations about respect and tolerance across faiths.

The post Namita thapar: What Happened to After Her Instagram Reel? appeared first on yesdaidanews.com.

The Allahabad High Court has mandated round-the-clock armed security for Haseen Khan, following a series of incidents that raised concerns over his safety and religious freedoms. The court’s decision comes in the wake of allegations that Khan was prevented from offering Namaz inside his private residence.

In a ruling delivered on March 11, 2026, the court directed that two armed guards accompany Haseen Khan wherever he goes until further orders. Justice Atul Sreedharan emphasized, “Any incident of violence that afflicts him or his property shall be prima facie understood to have occurred at the instance of the State.” This statement underscores the court’s commitment to protecting the constitutional rights of individuals to practice their religion without state interference.

The controversy traces back to an incident on January 16, 2026, when a group allegedly attempted to offer Namaz inside Khan’s home. Following this, Khan claimed he was detained by police while praying with family members, and he was compelled to place his thumb impression on a document he could not read due to illiteracy. These allegations prompted a petition by Tarik Khan, seeking permission for religious gatherings during Ramadan without prior state approval.

In its ruling, the Allahabad High Court clarified that no prior state permission is required for religious gatherings within private property, provided they do not spill onto public roads or spaces. This ruling aims to uphold the rights of individuals to conduct their religious practices freely, without undue restrictions from authorities.

The court had previously issued contempt notices to Bareilly District Magistrate Avinash Singh and Senior Superintendent of Police Anurag Arya for their roles in interfering with Khan’s prayer activities. The court summoned both officials to appear in person on March 23, 2026, warning that failure to comply could result in non-bailable warrants being issued against them.

The matter has been listed for final orders on March 23, 2026, at 2:00 PM, and observers are keenly awaiting the court’s next steps. The court’s actions reflect a broader concern regarding the protection of religious freedoms in India, particularly in light of recent tensions surrounding the practice of Islam in various regions.

As the situation develops, details remain unconfirmed regarding the implications of the court’s ruling for local law enforcement and the broader community in Bareilly. The outcome of the upcoming hearing could set a significant precedent for how religious practices are regulated in private spaces across the state.

The post Allahabad High Court Orders Security for Haseen Khan appeared first on yesdaidanews.com.