The case is formally titled Aman Gupta v. John Doe & Ors. and has gained attention due to its implications for personality rights in an era dominated by AI-generated content. On the same day, Justice Jyoti Singh recused herself from the case, which will now be heard by Justice Tushar Rao Gedela on May 7.

This legal move is not isolated. The Delhi High Court has previously ruled in favor of several public figures, including well-known personalities like Salman Khan and Mohanlal, granting them relief against unauthorized exploitation of their identities. Such precedents illustrate how the court acknowledges the increasing misuse of likeness and identity online.

Legal representatives for Gupta include Senior Advocate Diya Kapur and Advocate Nakul Gandhi, who argue that protecting these rights is essential for individuals in the public eye. The court has been proactive in issuing john doe orders in similar cases, which serve to protect the interests of those whose personalities are exploited without consent.

This context matters because it highlights a pivotal moment for celebrities navigating a digital world where their images can be easily replicated or misused. As AI technology evolves, so too do the challenges surrounding personality rights.

The implications extend beyond Gupta. Other public figures have also filed similar suits as they seek to safeguard their identities against unauthorized representations that could tarnish their brands or reputations.

As this legal battle unfolds, observers are keenly watching how it may shape future rulings regarding personality rights in India. The outcome could set significant precedents for other cases involving unauthorized use of celebrity likenesses.

In essence, Aman Gupta’s actions are part of a broader movement among celebrities striving to reclaim control over their personal brands in an age where digital content proliferates rapidly and often without permission.

The post Aman Gupta personality rights suit: What does it mean for celebrities? appeared first on yesdaidanews.com.

Is Delhi truly a hub for child trafficking? Recent remarks from the Delhi High Court suggest that it might be. The court issued a notice on a public interest litigation concerning the alarming rise in child trafficking incidents, particularly from railway stations and trains.

Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya emphasized the severity of the situation, stating, “Delhi has now become a mandi for child trafficking. Just roam around the railway stations for two hours, and you can gather what is going on there.” His comments reflect a growing concern that despite various orders from the court, the menace of child trafficking remains unabated.

The petition, filed by the Just Rights for Children Alliance and represented by Advocate Prabhsahay Kaur, highlights the urgent need for action. The court has requested the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) to provide necessary data and suggestions to address the issue effectively.

In response to the surge in child trafficking incidents, the Union Railways Ministry has notified a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) aimed at curbing these activities. However, the effectiveness of such measures is still in question.

Recent developments have further complicated the situation. The Delhi Police Special Cell arrested a wanted terrorist in the Ghazipur area, who was reportedly the handler of a recently busted module. During the arrest, foreign currencies from Bangladesh, Nepal, and Pakistan, as well as a Nepalese SIM card, were recovered from the accused.

These incidents underscore the interconnectedness of various criminal activities in the region, raising concerns about the safety of vulnerable populations, particularly children. The court’s ongoing scrutiny of child trafficking in Delhi reflects a broader societal issue that requires immediate and sustained attention.

While the Delhi High Court continues to express concerns and issue directives regarding child trafficking, the situation does not appear to improve due to a lack of effective implementation of existing measures. As Chief Justice Upadhyaya noted, “It is common knowledge that such trafficking of children of tender age is rampant.”

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the full extent of the problem and the effectiveness of the measures being implemented. As the situation develops, the focus remains on ensuring the safety and rights of children in Delhi.

The post Delhi: Is Really a Hub for Child Trafficking? appeared first on yesdaidanews.com.

In a recent development, Rajpal Yadav addressed a controversy involving Akshay Kumar during the promotions for their film Bhooth Bangla. This incident gained attention after a viral video surfaced, showing Akshay Kumar asking Rajpal Yadav to move aside during a group photo.

Rajpal Yadav clarified that the gesture was a respectful adjustment for the group photo, stating, “If I talk about the controversy of that day, both Akshay and Ekta had come along with the other two girls. I was late, and they were waiting for me.” He emphasized that Akshay Kumar prefers to arrange group photos with females in the middle, which was the reason behind the adjustment.

The film Bhooth Bangla is set to release on April 10, 2026. This upcoming release marks another collaboration between the two actors, who have a long professional history, having worked together in multiple films.

Despite the controversy, Rajpal Yadav expressed his admiration for Akshay Kumar, saying, “This is actually the deep-rooted moral values of Akshay Paji… I don’t know what people thought from a distance.” He added, “In life, he loves me, I love him, and I get inspired by him somewhere.” This statement reflects the camaraderie they share, despite the misunderstandings that arose.

Currently, Rajpal Yadav is out on interim bail in a Rs 9 crore cheque bounce case, with the Delhi High Court extending his bail until April 1, 2026. Yadav has decided to contest this case in court rather than settle it out of court.

As the situation unfolds, fans and followers of both actors are keenly observing their interactions and any further developments related to the controversy. The public’s reaction has been mixed, with some supporting Yadav’s clarification while others continue to speculate about the incident.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding any potential impact this controversy may have on the film’s promotion or the actors’ relationship moving forward. However, it is clear that both Rajpal Yadav and Akshay Kumar are committed to their professional engagements and maintaining a positive rapport.

The post Rajpal yadav: What is the Latest on and Akshay Kumar’s Controversy? appeared first on yesdaidanews.com.

The National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS) has been actively managing various examination processes and related financial matters for medical candidates. Recently, the board has issued multiple notices reminding candidates to submit their bank details for the processing of Goods and Services Tax (GST) refunds. This situation has become critical as 478 candidates have yet to provide the necessary information, prompting the NBEMS to set a deadline for submissions.

Recent Developments

On March 12, 2026, NBEMS announced that failure to submit the required bank details by April 15, 2026, would result in the non-processing of GST refunds. The board emphasized the importance of this deadline, stating, “Failure to submit the bank details latest by 15/04/2026, shall result in non-processing of the refund of GST amount.” This notice has raised concerns among candidates who are eager to receive their refunds.

Legal Rulings Affecting DNB Seat Reservations

In a related development, the Delhi High Court has intervened in the matter of seat reservations for the Diplomate of National Board (DNB) program. The court ordered the NBEMS to reserve one DNB seat for a NEET-PG candidate who had previously been denied the opportunity due to administrative issues. The candidate involved had an All India Rank of 33,017 in the NEET-PG 2025 examination, highlighting the competitive nature of medical admissions.

Reactions from Key Parties

Justice Jasmeet Singh, who presided over the case, noted that the petitioner was not actively pursuing a postgraduate course and had already relinquished her allotted seat in the stray round. This ruling has been met with mixed reactions from the medical community, as it underscores the complexities surrounding seat allocations and the importance of timely administrative actions.

Upcoming Examination Timelines

In addition to the ongoing issues with GST refunds and seat reservations, the Graduate Pharmacy Aptitude Test (GPAT) 2026 was conducted on March 7, 2026. Candidates are now awaiting the provisional answer key, which is expected to be released later this month. The final results for GPAT 2026 are anticipated by April 7, 2026, adding to the urgency for candidates involved in these examinations.

Advice for Candidates

As candidates navigate these developments, they are advised to save copies of the answer key for future reference, as stated by the NBEMS. This precaution will help ensure that they have access to important information regarding their performance and any potential disputes that may arise from the examination results.

Looking Ahead

As the April 15 deadline approaches for the submission of bank details for GST refunds, candidates are urged to act promptly to avoid complications. Observers believe that the NBEMS will continue to face scrutiny regarding its administrative processes and the handling of seat reservations, especially in light of recent court rulings. The situation remains fluid, and further developments are expected as stakeholders respond to these ongoing challenges.

The post NBEMS Issues Notice on GST Refunds and DNB Seat Reservation appeared first on yesdaidanews.com.

Recent Developments

On March 5, 2026, the Delhi High Court found that the officer had acted outside the legal provisions by issuing a refund order after the land acquisition, which involved a substantial amount of 3.26 crore. The court’s decision reinforces the importance of adhering to established legal frameworks in administrative actions, particularly in sensitive matters like land acquisition.

Anuj Agnihotri’s Journey

In a related context, Anuj Agnihotri, a probationer in the DANICS service, recently achieved All India Rank 1 in the UPSC Civil Services Examination 2025. Agnihotri’s journey to success was marked by perseverance, as he attempted the UPSC exam three times before securing the top rank. His graduation from AIIMS Jodhpur in 2023 and his family’s support played crucial roles in his academic and professional achievements.

Reactions from Key Parties

Following the court’s ruling, reactions from various stakeholders have emerged. Anuj Agnihotri expressed his feelings about his UPSC success, stating, “I was informed of the result just now. Currently, I am a probationer in the DANICS service.” He emphasized the effort required for the UPSC journey, describing it as a “gruelling journey” but ultimately rewarding.

Looking Ahead

Observers note that the ruling against the DANICS officer may lead to increased scrutiny of administrative actions in similar cases, ensuring that legal protocols are strictly followed. The implications of this decision could resonate within the civil services, as it underscores the accountability expected from public officials.

As the situation develops, officials and observers will be closely monitoring how this ruling affects not only the officer involved but also the broader landscape of civil service conduct in India. The emphasis on legal adherence in administrative decisions is likely to shape future policies and practices within the DANICS and other civil services.

The post DANICS Officer’s Disciplinary Penalty Upheld by Delhi High Court appeared first on yesdaidanews.com.