The recent ruling by the Allahabad High Court raises a pivotal question: Should officiating principals of grant-in-aid institutions in Uttar Pradesh receive salaries equal to those of regular principals? The court’s answer is a resounding yes. This decision underscores the responsibilities and duties that officiating principals undertake, which are often more demanding than those of their peers.

On April 6, 2026, the Allahabad High Court determined that officiating principals must be compensated with a salary that matches that of regular principals. The court emphasized that the long duration of holding the position does not grant any additional rights beyond the salary equivalent to that of a regular principal. This ruling is significant as it acknowledges the essential role these officiating principals play within their institutions.

The court’s decision was influenced by the provisions of the U.P. Education Service Selection Commission Act, 2023, which supersedes earlier regulations established by the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1971. The court noted that while the new Commission Act does not negate the provisions for appointing ad-hoc or officiating principals, it clarifies their rights regarding salary and service conditions.

Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Justice Swarupama Chaturvedi articulated the court’s position, stating, “Having recognized that a person is required to officiate as Principal of an intermediate college by way of necessity existing in law and he is required to perform higher and more onerous duties, than that of any other teacher at such institution, his right to receive higher salary commensurate to such duties discharged, may never be defeated.” This statement highlights the court’s acknowledgment of the critical responsibilities that officiating principals bear.

Moreover, the court allowed the petitioners to continue serving as officiating principals until regular appointments are made, thus ensuring stability within the institutions. The ruling also stipulates that if a vacancy persists, officiating principals are entitled to a higher salary for up to 30 days, reinforcing the need for timely appointments.

In addressing the management of these institutions, the court remarked that the need for ad-hoc principals arises not from arbitrary decisions but from the legal necessities of the educational framework. The court clarified that failures on the part of management committees to notify vacancies should not undermine the rights of officiating principals to receive appropriate compensation.

As this ruling unfolds, it remains to be seen how the U.P. Education Service Selection Commission will implement these changes and what impact they will have on the educational landscape in Uttar Pradesh. The court’s decision marks a significant step in recognizing the contributions of officiating principals, but details regarding the broader implications for educational policy and administration remain unconfirmed.

The post Uttar pradesh state board of high school and intermediate education: What are the recent developments regarding the ? appeared first on yesdaidanews.com.

The Allahabad High Court has mandated round-the-clock armed security for Haseen Khan, following a series of incidents that raised concerns over his safety and religious freedoms. The court’s decision comes in the wake of allegations that Khan was prevented from offering Namaz inside his private residence.

In a ruling delivered on March 11, 2026, the court directed that two armed guards accompany Haseen Khan wherever he goes until further orders. Justice Atul Sreedharan emphasized, “Any incident of violence that afflicts him or his property shall be prima facie understood to have occurred at the instance of the State.” This statement underscores the court’s commitment to protecting the constitutional rights of individuals to practice their religion without state interference.

The controversy traces back to an incident on January 16, 2026, when a group allegedly attempted to offer Namaz inside Khan’s home. Following this, Khan claimed he was detained by police while praying with family members, and he was compelled to place his thumb impression on a document he could not read due to illiteracy. These allegations prompted a petition by Tarik Khan, seeking permission for religious gatherings during Ramadan without prior state approval.

In its ruling, the Allahabad High Court clarified that no prior state permission is required for religious gatherings within private property, provided they do not spill onto public roads or spaces. This ruling aims to uphold the rights of individuals to conduct their religious practices freely, without undue restrictions from authorities.

The court had previously issued contempt notices to Bareilly District Magistrate Avinash Singh and Senior Superintendent of Police Anurag Arya for their roles in interfering with Khan’s prayer activities. The court summoned both officials to appear in person on March 23, 2026, warning that failure to comply could result in non-bailable warrants being issued against them.

The matter has been listed for final orders on March 23, 2026, at 2:00 PM, and observers are keenly awaiting the court’s next steps. The court’s actions reflect a broader concern regarding the protection of religious freedoms in India, particularly in light of recent tensions surrounding the practice of Islam in various regions.

As the situation develops, details remain unconfirmed regarding the implications of the court’s ruling for local law enforcement and the broader community in Bareilly. The outcome of the upcoming hearing could set a significant precedent for how religious practices are regulated in private spaces across the state.

The post Allahabad High Court Orders Security for Haseen Khan appeared first on yesdaidanews.com.